![]() ![]() IE.it stands behind what it sells you, it doesn't charge you to be forever fixing/upgrading.īeing the author of CPT I’m biased of course.Īll three programs have some overlapping features, but are in general quite distinctive as they have a different focus. I will say that Chessbase constantly upgrades and fixes problems.no extra charge unlike this stupid (IMHO) model Stephan employs. CPT is FAR MORE COMPLICATED to use by the way. If you have the $$, get it.at least the basic version. The new version also has cool new ways to analyse. Its' similar to CPT in that sense, you just don't get the cues or the ability to randomly jump about.Ĭhessbase also has an awesome "live book" feature you can display inside any game which shows you each move for your opponent (and you) and the win percentage and number of games.and an evaluation. Push the move arrow and see if it is what you are thinking. ![]() In doing so, you can make your first move, get several options for Black and then mentally decide on your choice to each. Take for instance this comparison: You can create a simple opening as a game.lets call it the Dunst Opening (1.Nc3) and view it in TRAINING MODE. It is a game oriented database.but versatile. That said, let me tell you something about Chessbase that is rather like CPT. ![]() They should stick with what they do well.anything else and the inevitable comparisons are going to weigh against it. Let me say that.any program that might take a 'position trainer' concept and keep adding on to it to the point where they try to make it like Chessbase, is taking the wrong track. I've had every version of Chessbase since #7. How does CPT compare to Fritz or Chessbase in terms of training your skills/repertuare?ĭoes CPT have some advantage over Fritz in your opinion? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |